By Neil Sullivan
During the recent Peachtree City Council election, I shared my concern that multi-use development in Peachtree City may have impact on our school zoning. Some would assure us that these developments would not include apartments.
I fear this is a distinction without difference. Whether they are called apartments, flats, town houses, condominiums, co-ops, time shares, or van life rest stops, dense multi-unit stacked housing is where developers profit in multi-use development.
According to former Mayor Brown’s recent article, Peachtree City is prioritizing “Affordable Housing”. While there are many different definitions, in most cases, “affordable housing” includes dense, multi-unit housing like we are seeing spring up in Fayetteville.
In her letter to the editor, Ms. Emily Winkle informs us that “Fayette County is aging at an unusual rate. According to the US Census Bureau, the percentage of the population 65+ grew from 12.9% in 2010 to 19.5% in 2021. One of the many reasons this is compelling is because our citizens can opt out of contributing tax dollars to our school system at age 62.”
This is interesting, when you consider that the student FTE population of Fayette County schools is down in the same period from 21,517 to 19,497 (-2,020 or -9.4%) resulting in the closure of four schools. However, it is important to note that schools that serve Peachtree City’s children are down only 12 (McIntosh down 1) student FTEs over the same period.
These numbers above reflect my concern. By considering adding housing (whatever we call it) the numbers suggest we will be adding to our already robust PTC school zones. While I am certain this will be profitable for the developers, I question whether it will be beneficial for Peachtree City’s existing residents.
Now I believe that Ms. Winkle and her “Plan for PTC” cadre are well intended. However, unless they propose displacing the…
Read the full article here
